Saturday, December 18, 2010

Letters to Mom-in-Law

Buttercup's Mom occasionally forwards emails from the conservative action sites she frequents.  This morning, she sent one from GOPUSA the contents of which led to a link for a Stansberry Research letter  [ad].  (If you click to close the tab it will ask you if you want to skip the video but stay on the page.  I exercised that option.)

Below find the contents of my commentary response email while also remembering:
  1. this blog's disclaimer (see very bottom of the page);
  2. I am not qualified, certified, or entitled to provide anyone advice;
  3. to have a Merry Christmas and/or Happy Holiday;
  4. that anonymous charity is a true Gentleman's calling.
**********
i had to stop listening because there was too much self-promotion at the beginning, but when it offered to let me read the note that he wrote i skimmed it -
facts are facts - the us fed now owns more treasury debt than any other sovereign nation in the world, china, britain, etc. that is true -
also true, those 14-17% of americans on food stamps are a continuing flow of inflation via debt monetization as they exchange a parallel cash currency for products - on the other hand, we must ask ourselves if the world casts the US into a confidence crisis would our money be more, or less valuable?  our debts more or less impactful?  as an inflationist, i believe that people who hold money are actually in favorable position because they can generate flow to offset relative declining flow against real property - for those without cash coverage on their notes, the above is actually the very reason why i would recommend any unsophisticated investor that is around my age to treat houses not as investments, but as expensive necessities - in paying down a mortgage you earn 4-8% compounding interest by not owing the bank that same interest - addition by subtraction, as it were -
in my view, gold bugs are late to the party, while silver remains cheap relative to its industrial applications -
ultimately, currencies and economies built in fiat money are confidence based, and are therefore the very definition of ponzi schemes - many times i have posited that governments do not act to protect their citizens, but to keep them indoctrinated in a system through bank debt, taxation, and some semblance of a legal system etc., to keep them believing that everything is real, even if it isn't - that everything is fair, even if it isn't -
all of the above noted, i'd rather own my house than a stock i'd want to hold for 10 years, i'd rather have knowledge of how to grow food than have dehydrated milk stuffed in the floor boards, and i'd rather own guns than gold - in other words, preparing for every eventuality, even if rooted in fiscal misappropriation, extends well beyond the small, incestuous world of bankers and their political toys -

Thursday, December 2, 2010

The Six Stages of [Trader] Development

While drawing on the hunting metaphor for Insider Trading:  Where's the Sport in that? I recalled the Six Stages of Hunter Development** taught in local hunter education classes.  The stages read like a Disney plot of childish excitement, greed, then personal development, and a punchline.  And perhaps human nature always follows such a path.  While some mire in the early, greedy stages most of the rest of the world is deeper than that, and it's good to be reminded so when rising to an unwritten, unspoken cause seems lonely.
  1. Shooting Stage - The priority is getting off a shot, rather than patiently waiting for a good shot.
  2. Limiting-out Stage - Success is determined by bagging the limit.  In extreme cases, this need to limit out can cause hunters to take unsafe shots.
  3. Trophy Stage - The hunter is selective and judges success by quality rather than quantity.  Typically, the focus is on big game and anything that doesn't measure up to the desired trophy is ignored.
  4. Method Stage - In this stage, the process of hunting becomes the focus.  A hunter may still want to bag a limit, but places a high priority on how it is accomplished.
  5. Sportsman Stage - Success is measured by the total experience - the appreciation of the environment, the game, the process of the hunt, and the companionship of fellow hunters.
  6. "Give-Back" Stage - Hunters are interested in introducing others to hunting and passing on the proper hunting values.  These hunters also teach others about safety and the responsibilities of hunting.
If good deeds, like cards in their frailty, are many to build a house, then it only takes one developmentally stunted jerk to screw everything up.  Those who find joy in the construction, though, shall never be disappointed.

** - the numbered list above is copyright by Kalkomey Enterprises, Inc., it is reprinted without permission, but hopefully the fact that I don't make any money from this blog, as well as the fact that I am trying to make a point for the cause of idealism will earn me a pass.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Insider Trading: Where's the Sport in that?

Earlier today James Altucher wrote an article entitled Maybe Insider Trading Should be Legal, outlining a number of possible benefits associated with doing just that.  In my view, insider trading is endemic to people of a certain greed.  A greed that cares nothing about efficient effort and sound gamesmanship for maximizing returns.  Even if insider trading were legalized would an ethical person feel right about partaking in the activity?  What's the point in issuing common equity to everyone if only certain of the players are privy to details?

[ruminations on the risks of unregulated syndicated trading, in a future post]

Legalizing insider trading would be another step on a long, tall staircase toward the cheapening of trust and values in the United States.  As a small, individual trader I once told my buddy that trading against Goldman, HFT, and the Hedgies is like hunting bear with a club - visceral.  It is a challenge, it is heartrending, it is deeply rewarding, and the P/L statement is the scorecard.  But without a tilt of ethical fairness, the score would be meaningless.  The money lends itself to the superiority felt by knowing that you beat the odds.

Ultimately, though, in hunting and in life there exist people who pull on the boots and get dirty, and those that fill the feeders and show up.

In taking up challenge, John F. Kennedy masterfully spoke:
We choose to go to the moon ... and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

2011: The Year of the Entrepreneur

In my view, an overarching theme for investing in 2011 should center on the rise of entrepreneurship.
  • Some jobs lost to technology and efficiency will not come back.  These jobs may have continued for years if not for a recession forcing companies to streamline;
  • Some unemployed will have developed a taste for not suffering the abject strains placed upon them by The Man, rather, seeking to leverage their expertise out of the home;
  • Some unemployed may have spent their time learning a new skill, or developing a business, and after a year or two of incubation will be prepared to take the plunge;
  • Some that survived the cuts will realize that their job is only as secure as the next recession, and seek to secure their futures ahead of such a recurrence;
  • The ever present awareness that their nest eggs are too little, as well as the constant delay of Social Security, will drive some of the retiring to side jobs as consultants or craftsmen;
  • We have only seen the beginning of a new industry that is the Cloud and the limitless technological possibilities it will unleash;
  • Globalization means that developing areas need all levels of experience to speed their indoctrination into a world that seems ordinary to most Americans.  The internet avails remote knowledge transfer;
  • Those unwilling or unable to take small business loans, especially those currently unemployed, will take advantage of government initiatives (forcing SB lending, not unlike subprime loan policy) with the understanding that you can't get any broker than broke;
  • American business has lost its way.  The impersonal nature of national companies, and the resulting customer abuses will drive some to business formation with the idea that customer service can still beat bottom dollar;
  • Entrepreneurs relish the challenge.  True entrepreneurs who may have been hobbled or wiped clean by the last few years' economic decimation will get back on the horse to apply what they have learned in new endeavors.
I like Capital Source, CSE, a well capitalized lender to medium and small businesses as one of my most likely to double picks for 2011.  Without a doubt, much of the forced lending to small businesses will be lost by virtue of the fact that a preponderance of new startups fail within the first few years, however, the early stages of loan growth will candy up balance sheets with expanding credit extension and nearly 100% servicing payments.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Notes from the Paddock: CHDN Looking Rough

Check out the red flags waving in Churchill Downs news releases.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

This Country Needs a Hero

Out of such crises as the world now faces, heroes arise because the public wants, needs, order.  These heroes needn't be protagonists.  Indeed, Adolf Hitler was a hero to the German people who found themselves left in physical and economic ruin subsequent to World War I.

The United States of America must scour its ranks over the next two years to find a leader which will instill, restore, to this country the following qualities, at a minimum:
  • Hope - must see opportunity, not obstacles;
  • Trust - must be honest, act with good faith, inherently apolitical, or probably deemed "a loose cannon" by opponents within and outside the standing political systems;
  • Honor - does the right things when no one is watching, does not hide behind FOIA redacted texts;
  • Accountability - holds others and is held to personal culpability for decisions;
  • Creativity - not indoctrinated by the status quo, would not lean on "it's complicated" as an excuse to continue dysfunctional causes.
Any longer, politics have become a means by which integrity goes on the negotiating block next to reason.  Thusly, trustworthy people are labeled "loose cannons" by their parties because they cannot be counted on to vote against their conscience, even if the party line dictates that they do so.  @JPCounihan thinks that perhaps the world as we know it must go to zero before the citizens will accept such radical qualities in a leader.  I say that such qualities are the foundations on which the country was built.  We need not go to zero, perhaps stopping at the top-of-slab would be sufficient.

To be sure, if every object relates to another as posited here, then the entropy accelerating this country into disaster can be likened to the inexplicable acceleration of the bounds of our universe.  Can we explore balance in our reality, or shall we simply resign ourselves to impending doom, by fire, by ice, by Big Rip, by alien invasion, by nuclear holocaust.

Perhaps we should all study the Tao, or at least the Three Jewels thereof:  Compassion, Moderation, Humility.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Free Markets and Free Enterprise: Not Synonymous

I may or may not come back and complete this stub of a post.

The essence of the point is that Free Markets will allocate resources to the most favorable environs for profit.  Whereas Free Enterprise means maximizing the advantage of such environs, even if by impinging the basic rights of such locale as defined by the most comprehensive body of rights represented among involved parties.

Too often corporations hide behind the banner of Free Enterprise, counting on fools to misunderstand the subtle differences between it and Free Markets for the purpose of returning shareholder profit at the cost of the local citizenry, present and future.

Examples include Apple's Foxconn workers jumping from buildings after enduring unsavory working conditions for years, among others.

It is most important, even for a libertarian, to recall that without affording others our version of basic human rights we are animals and hypocrites.  Too, corporate profits measured against human suffering should duly taint all bearers' karma.